McDunn v. Arnold, 2013 MT 138 (May 28, 2013) (5-0) (McGrath, C.J.)
Issue: (1) Whether the district court properly allowed McDunns to amend their complaint and add a new claim; (2) whether the district court properly denied Arnold’s motion in limine to prohibit reference to the testimony and evidence presented in the justice court; and (3) whether Arnold was denied her right to a trial de novo.
Short Answer: (1) Yes; (2) yes; and (3) no.
Affirmed…